SignalGate · Built in cooperation with TrustFlare

Different accounts.
A connected pattern.

Signup, login, payment and OTP events can look ordinary in isolation. The harder question is whether they belong to coordinated activity—and whether the evidence justifies adding friction.

Look beyond a single account.
Account AAccount BAccount C
Related device and behavior signalsRepeated trial claims
Before granting the next trialApply your risk policy
Illustrative pattern. A connection alone does not prove abuse.

01

Each account is assessed on its own

Activity spread across accounts can stay below each account’s limits.

How it shows up

  • Several accounts repeatedly claim the same offer.
  • Each new account stays below the transaction limit.

02

An IP address carries too much weight

One network signal is asked to distinguish legitimate users from coordinated abuse.

How it shows up

  • A shared office network triggers restrictions.
  • Distributed activity changes addresses between attempts.

03

The decision happens after the costly step

The system recognizes a suspicious pattern only after completing the action.

How it shows up

  • OTP messages have already been sent.
  • A promotional reward has already been issued.

04

A risk score has no agreed consequence

The application receives an assessment but lacks a consistent response policy.

How it shows up

  • One flow blocks while another ignores the same signal.
  • A challenge appears without a usable recovery path.

05

A blocked attempt is counted as a proven win

Restriction volume obscures the effect on legitimate users and actual losses.

How it shows up

  • A rule reduces signups by rejecting real customers.
  • Fewer OTP requests coincide with more support complaints.

Choose the decision that needs better evidence.

SignalGate connects device intelligence to signup, login, payment and OTP flows. Start with the abuse pattern and the legitimate users your policy must accommodate.

Visit signalgate.ai